

Yes. The plan covers as many or as few buildings as the board decides, and the per-building report is what makes that split defensible in the minutes. Because each building is documented separately, a board can see that two buildings sit lower on the lot and hold standing water while six stay dry, and vote to address the two. Standing water and active leaks come first, because water left in a shared crawlspace raises moisture readings in the floor joists above it, and Mold-Like Substance on those joists follows. Existing Mold-Like Substance and failed insulation come next, then the humidity control and vapor barrier upgrades that keep a dry crawlspace dry. A typical case is a condominium association with eleven units over one shared crawlspace. The evaluation finds standing water at the low corner, Mold-Like Substance present on the floor joists above it, and dry conditions at the far end. The board is not choosing between doing everything and doing nothing. It can vote this year to pump out and clean the wet section and treat the affected joists under a Mold Treatment, with the exterior drainage that fed the water corrected in the same phase. The vapor barrier and dehumidifier for the rest of the crawlspace can wait for a later fiscal year.

No. The board chooses which buildings or units go into each phase, and the per-building reports are what let it defend that choice in the minutes. A typical first phase addresses the buildings with standing water or Mold-Like Substance present, and leaves dry buildings on an evaluation-only schedule until conditions or budget change.
The board receives one written report per building, with photographs of each finding and moisture readings, plus a scoped proposal for any recommended work. Findings are written as observed conditions rather than opinions, so the report stands on its own at the meeting and reads the same to a board member, a management company, or a competing bidder.
Phased proposals let the board spread work across fiscal years, and the report can go to whoever prepares the reserve study. The board and its accountant decide whether an item is capital or operating. The request form on this page asks for your timeline, including the next budget cycle.
Yes. We present findings to the board in person as a rule, and by video or phone when the meeting calendar calls for it, walking through the report one building at a time and taking questions on the photographs. The report is also written so a management company can present it without us.
The board decides. In a typical case it approves phase one of the proposal, or it files the report and schedules a re-evaluation for the next season, or it enrolls the buildings in the Annual Evaluation Program and lets the seasonal schedule drive the rest. Nothing is booked until the board or its management company confirms it in writing.
Proposals name materials by specification and break work into numbered phases, so a board comparing bids can line them up scope for scope. If the bid process calls for a certificate of insurance or a W-9, the request form on this page has a checkbox for each, so they arrive with the proposal.
Whether a crawlspace is a common element or the unit owner's responsibility is set by the association's governing documents, which the board's attorney reads. The evaluation adds location. Every finding is tied to a building and, where the layout allows, the unit above it, so the board can apply its responsibility split to documented conditions instead of a complaint.